Path: news.cs.au.dk!news.net.uni-c.dk!uninett.no!news.maxwell.syr.edu!oleane!ciril.fr!univ-lille1.fr!news!univ-rennes1.fr!irisa.fr!not-for-mail
From: Yoann Padioleau <padiolea@hcand.irisa.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.beta
Subject: Re: procedure call
Date: 19 Jul 1999 16:53:21 +0200
Organization: IRISA, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes Cedex, FRANCE
Lines: 39
Message-ID: <wi6zp0sitcu.fsf@hcand.irisa.fr>
References: <wi64sj0kf58.fsf@hcand.irisa.fr> <yc0vhbgakaz.fsf@ufleku.cs.au.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hcand.irisa.fr
X-Trace: news.irisa.fr 932396001 17237 131.254.50.32 (19 Jul 1999 14:53:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@irisa.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Jul 1999 14:53:21 GMT
X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.3
Xref: news.cs.au.dk comp.lang.beta:12030

nospam2159@cs.au.dk (Peter von der Ahé) writes:

> None the two program segments you have posted will compile, maybe you
> where thinking of something like this:
> 
> (#
> 
>    A: (#
> 	 attribute : @ text;
> 	 method : (# ... #)
>       #)
> do
>    1 -> A.attribute;
>    2 -> A.method       (* ??? *)
> #)
> 
> vs.
> 
> (#
> 
>    A: @(#
> 	 attribute : @ text;
> 	 method : (# ... #)
>        #);
> do
>    1 -> A.attribute;
>    2 -> A.method
> #)
> 
> But I'm not sure what you see as a problem...
In on case, attribute is a @ and in the other it is a pattern.
That's not the same thing.


> 
> /Peter

-- 
pad